| Today's Smile sponsored by: Reach Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
Obstructionist-in-Chief
By:
Daniel Moss Regarding obstructionism, a quick overview of the current political landscape is in order. The Republican Party currently controls the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives. Conservatives also comprise a majority of the Supreme Court, and Republicans hold a majority of the state governorships. Additionally, one of the major news channels generally serves as the propaganda arm of the Republican Party, and the Bush Administration can count on the passionate support of the editorial page of one of the most influential newspapers in the country as well as the screaming support of the vast majority of political talk radio stations across the country. Furthermore, particularly since September 11, the Administration has been the beneficiary of a generally compliant news media, which all too often has let many of its statements and policies go unchallenged, regardless of the accuracy of those statements and the harmful impact of those policies. Of course, it could be argued that the very notion of obstructionism is absurd in George Bush’s Washington -- unless one defines ‘obstructionism’ as President Bush not getting absolutely everything he wants. The Senate has approved the overwhelming majority of the President’s judicial nominations; Congress has passed multiple tax cuts; the Patriot Act stands ready to be renewed. Additionally, Congress – the House of Representatives, in particular – has almost entirely abdicated its oversight responsibilities, and merely serves as a rubber stamp for the latest whims of the President. (A Republican Congress which found it imperative to spend millions of dollars during the Clinton years investigating issues such as the firings at the White House Travel Office and a failed real estate venture can not be bothered to hold one official hearing on the Downing Street memo or on the politicalization of science under this Administration.) Still,
to the extent that ‘obstructionism’ has occurred in recent
months, the responsibility for “getting things done” in Washington
falls squarely on the shoulders of President Bush and his Republican comrades.
While controlling all levers of the federal government, the Republican
Party has the responsibility to govern effectively. The failure of that
party to do so reflects staggering incompetence on the part of President
Bush and his allies. The
President’s role in impeding meaningful progress on a wide variety
of issues could not be clearer. For example: Of course, Republican obstructionism is nothing new. This is, after all, the party whose primary goal in the 1990’s seems to have been to block as much of President Clinton’s agenda as possible, and to remove the President from office at any cost. For this history alone, the current Republican complaints of Democratic obstructionism would ring hollow. But it is particularly laughable for the conservative movement to complain about alleged Democratic obstructionism while it controls the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government (as well as significant branches of the media). One might agree with the President that assigning blame for legislative failures – as well as for broken air conditioners and flat tires – is easy enough. President Bush, however, should start by looking in the mirror.
Daniel Moss is a consultant based in Arlington,
Virginia. He took a leave of absence in September 2004 to work as the
regional field director in Pittsburgh for the National Jewish Democratic
Council. |
|
|||
|
|||||||